WHAT THE COURT WILL CONSIDER IN AWARDING CUSTODY OF CHILDREN IN NIGERIA


Edited By: Asykobi

This  is written with the plight of parents battling with the issue of child custody in mind. Who will the Court grant the custody of a child or the children after going through the pains and trauma of a divorce or separation.Thus, the focus of this legal illumination is the  factors  the Court will consider in awarding custody to one of the parents.

The African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child defined a child as
 “every human being below the age of eighteen years”
The United Nation’s Convention on the Rights of the Child of 1989 defines a child as a person below the age of eighteen years except in the law applicable to the child, the age of majority is attained earlier.  Nigeria ratified the CRC in 1991 and domesticated it in 2003.

The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria does not define who a child is. However , the Child Rights Act which has been domesticated in some States  defines a child as 
“a person under the age of eighteen years” and defines the “Age of Maturity” as the age at which a person attains the age of eighteen years.
The Paramount Consideration
'The paramount consideration in  award of child custody is the interest of the children.

The General Considerations

(1) Where in any proceedings before any court the custody or upbringing of a minor is in question, the court in deciding the question shall regard the welfare of the minor as the first and paramount consideration and shall not take into consideration whether from any other point of view the claim of the father in respect of such custody is superior to that of the mother or the claim of the mother is superior to that of the father.

(2) In regard to the custody or upbringing of a minor, a mother shall have the same rights and authority as the law allows to a father and the rights and authority of mother and father shall be equal and exercisable by either without the other.

(3) Nor is there necessarily any rule that mother has a paramount claim as against other relations, at any rate where the father is alive and support the application of those relations.

(4) The welfare of the infant although the first and paramount consideration is not the sole consideration and the conduct of the parties is a matter to be taken into account.

(5) The adultery of a party is not necessarily reason for depriving that party of custody unless the circumstances of the adultery make it desirable.

(6) All the circumstances must be considered.

(7) The fact and advantages of brotherhood and sisterhood must also be considered when there is more than one child of the family and it is proposed to give custody of one child to one person and another to a different person.

8) There is settled rule that a child of tender years should remain in the custody of the mother, but obviously the care and supervision that a mother who is not out at work can give to little children is an important factor.

(9) In dealing with the questions of custody or access the court will have regard to the particular circumstances of each case always bearing in mind that the benefit and interest of the child is the paramount consideration and not the punishment of a spouse for misconduct.

(10) The wishes of an unimpeachable parent stand first.

11) Where both parents appear to be equal to the task of maintaining the children and are ready to give affection and proper guidance to the children. It was held that the interest of the male child who is 14 years old will best be served by granting custody to the father who will naturally be able to provide strong guidance for the teenage boy.

12) Regarding the female child, where both parents are eminently qualified, able and anxious to give affection and proper guidance to their child for whom they are responsible; they are likely to co-operate and swallow their vanity in the interest of the welfare of the child because of the affection they have for the child. There can be no real objection in this circumstance for an order for joint custody.

13) In general, under most systems of customary law in Nigeria the father of a legitimate child or legitimated child has absolute right to custody of the child. However customary law recognizes that the absolute right of the father will not be enforced where it will be detrimental to the welfare of the child.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE RIGHTS OF AN ILLEGITIMATE CHILD IN NIGERIA

Image
Edited By: Asykobi An illegitimate child has been referred to as a child born out of wedlock, while a legitimate child is an issue of wedlock. Plainly, a child born out of wedlock whose paternity has been acknowledged by his natural father is as much legitimate as one born in wedlock. That is not the case, however. A child born out of wedlock during a marriage is illegitimate under the Act, whether or not the child is acknowledged by the natural father; unless by custom, someone else has a prior claim to paternity of such a child. Where a child is born out of wedlock, the first question is who is entitled to the paternity of the child? The question is essential, particularly in a polygamous setting. The controversy as regards paternity has always been between the natural father and the mother’s father or the person who has paid the bride price on the mother. Customs vary. A majority of communities favor the claim of the man who had paid the bride price of the mother. This...
Read more

RIGHT OF AN ACCUSED PERSON UNDER THE NIGERIAN LAW

Image
Edited By : Asy'kobi Under the Nigerian criminal justice the constitutional right of an accused person is enshrined in Section 35 and 36 of the Constitution of  the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 such rights include, the right to be informed promptly in the language that he understands, the details and nature of the offence of the accused, the right to be given adequate time to prepare his defence, the right to defend himself in person or by legal practitioner of his own choice, the right to have an interpreter free of charge if he does not understand the language of the court, the right to have record of the proceeding kept and the right to have copies of this within seven days of the conclusion of the case, the right to remain silent during the trial, the right not to be tried and convicted twice for the same offence, the right to be presumed innocent until he is proved guilty and the right not to be charged for an unwritten offence. All these rights are aimed at ensurin...
Read more

IMMUNITY CLAUSE OF SECTION 308 OF THE NIGERIAN CONSTITUTION

Image
Edited by: Asy"kobi Meaning and limits of section  308 The provisions of section 308 of the Constitution came up for interpretation in the case of  Abacha vs. Fawehinmi,  wherein his lordship, Uwaifo, J.S.C., held thus: The immunity provided for does not apply to the person in question in his official capacity or to a civil or criminal proceeding in which such a person is only a nominal party. The immunity is to protect such a person from the harassment of his person while in office for his action done in his private capacity before or during his tenure in office. In fact in the present case, the suit is against the “Head of State and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces (General Sani Abacha) ” and it is in respect of his alleged action in his official capacity. The immunity provided for in the Constitution does not arise and does not apply. Also, in  Rotimi vs. MacGregor,  the then Military Governor of Western State, 1 st  appellant herein,...
Read more