DO JUDGES MAKE LAW???


Edited By: Asy'kobi
By virtue of the doctrine of separation of powers and checks and balances it is not the duty of the judiciary to make laws. The 1999 Constitution in sections 4-6 provided for the legislature to make laws, the executive to exercise executive powers and the judiciary to exercise judicial powers to determine questions of civil rights and obligations. • However as we found out earlier, common law is referred to as judge made laws because it was created by the itinerant judges in England. Therefore the controversy exists as to whether the courts do indeed make new law or whether law making is strictly reserved for the legislature. Judges have often insisted that they do not make law directly and there are two views on this question- the declaratory and the creative views.
THE DECLARATORY THEORY OF JUDICIAL FUNCTION 
• Blackstone’s is considered the originator of the Declaratory theory. He wrote that the judge is "sworn to determine, not according to his own private judgment, but according to the known laws and customs of the land; not delegated to pronounce a new law, but to maintain and expound the old one. William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England vol. 2, 
• According to this theory the law has always existed and judges merely discover the law as they are faced with different situations. Thus in any new case they derive the appropriate rule logically from already pre-existing legal principles. In other words, judges never make or create new law Blackstone’s theory has been adopted by some judges and theorists as reflected in the following holdings;
 • Lord MacMillian in Read v.Lyons (1947) A.C 156 
“Your Lordships’ task in this House is to decide particular cases between litigants and your lordships ARE NOT CALLED UPON TO RATIONALIZE THE LAW OF ENGLAND. That attractive, if perilous field, may be left to other hands to cultivate”
 • Lord Esher in Willis v Baddeley [1892] 2 QB 324
“There is no such thing as judge-made law, for the judges do not make the law, though they frequently have to apply existing law to circumstances as to which it has not previously been authoritatively laid down that such law is applicable”
THE CREATIVE THEORY OF JUDICIAL FUNCTION
 • The second opinion views the law as the will of the justices and accepts that judges do make law 
• Bentham’s in volume V of his WORKS wrote contemptuously of judge made law but acknowledged that judges do make law "It is the judges that make the common law, just as a man makes laws for his dog. When your dog does anything you want to break him of, you wait till he does it and then beat him. This is the way you make laws for your dog, and this is the way judges make laws for you and me."
 • John Austin regarded the declaratory theory as “the childish fiction employed by our judges that judiciary or common law is not made by them, but is a miraculous, something made by nobody, existing, I suppose from eternity, and merely declared from time to time by the judges”. He agreed that judges make Judicial law Lord Reid wrote
 “there was a time when it was thought almost indecent to suggest that judges do make law- they only declare it. Those with a taste for fairy tales seem to have thought that in some Aladdin’s Cave there is hidden the Common law in all its splendour and that on a judge’s appointment there descends on him knowledge of the magic words Open Sesame… But we do not believe in fairy tales any more” – The Judge as Law Maker (1972) 12 J.S.P.T.L (NA) 22
 • Justice Holmes poked fun at Blackstone’s theory when he stated that “The common law is not a brooding omnipresence in the sky, but the articulate voice of some sovereign or quasi-sovereign that can be identified - dissenting opinion in Southern Pacific Company v. Jensen, 244 United States Reports 205 at 222 (1917).  

WHEN JUDGES CAN VALIDLY MAKE NEW LAWS 
• It is incontrovertible that judges meet new circumstances that were not contemplated by the law makers when the law was first made and in such circumstances they create new law to meet the changed conditions, which are termed original precedents.
 • Thus Lord Radcliffe stated “there was never a more sterile controversy than that upon the question whether a judge makes law, of course he does. How can he help it?” 
• The modern consensus is that judges do make laws and these may be in the following situations
 • 1. In interpreting statutory texts with ambiguous words when he employs the various rules of interpretation like the golden rule etc. to widen or restrict the scope of the statute relevantly and contextually.
 • 2. When there is a lacuna not covered by a statute or case law
  According to Justice Niki Tobi
 “Second, there are instances when there exists neither statutes nor case law on a matter before the judge. In such instances, the judge is initially helpless, but the case before him must be decided one way or the other. He cannot adjourn the case and ask the Legislature to pass a statute on the point before him. He cannot fold his arms and tell the litigants that he is helpless on the ground that there is no relevant statute or case law governing the issue before him. He must do something and quickly too for that matter. He has no option in the matter. He, therefore, propounds a principle suitable to the case before him. The principle is novel. The Principle is an innovation and so the judge is said to have made the law” – Niki Tobi, Sources of Nigerian law, p.79
• Instances when judges have recognized new claims and expanded or widened the law include – Hedley Byrne co. ltd. v Hellers Partners ltd. (1961) 3 W.L.R 1225 – (Tort of negligent misrepresentation), Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) A.C 562 – (Neighbour principle for determining the existence of a duty of care in negligence), Lakanmi and Anor v. Attorney General of Western Nigeria and others (!971) 1 U.I.L.R. 201 (Application of ouster clauses), Peter Obi v. INEC (S.C. 123/2007) – (when the term of a governor begins to run). In India, Vishakha v State of Rajasthan (1997) 6 SCC 241 took judicial legislation to an unprecedented level by relying on international treaties on the subject of sexual harassment that had not been domesticated and finally providing guidelines to regulate such cases until the legislature makes a law on the Subject. And Shaw v. DPP [1962] AC 220 (the Ladies Directory Case) created the crime of conspiracy to corrupt public morals in England 
LIMITS/CHECKS TO JUDICIAL LAW MAKING 

• Judges while exercising their judicial functions are held in check by the following considerations so that they do not trespass into the realm of the legislature and remove the certainty for which the law is known. These considerations are

 • Judges take an oath of office to defend the constitution
 • Doctrine of stare decisis or precedents require judges to abide by previous decisions of higher courts
 • National Judicial Council as the disciplinary body that can dismiss any judge that breaches the code of conduct for judges.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE RIGHTS OF AN ILLEGITIMATE CHILD IN NIGERIA

Image
Edited By: Asykobi An illegitimate child has been referred to as a child born out of wedlock, while a legitimate child is an issue of wedlock. Plainly, a child born out of wedlock whose paternity has been acknowledged by his natural father is as much legitimate as one born in wedlock. That is not the case, however. A child born out of wedlock during a marriage is illegitimate under the Act, whether or not the child is acknowledged by the natural father; unless by custom, someone else has a prior claim to paternity of such a child. Where a child is born out of wedlock, the first question is who is entitled to the paternity of the child? The question is essential, particularly in a polygamous setting. The controversy as regards paternity has always been between the natural father and the mother’s father or the person who has paid the bride price on the mother. Customs vary. A majority of communities favor the claim of the man who had paid the bride price of the mother. This...
Read more

RIGHT OF AN ACCUSED PERSON UNDER THE NIGERIAN LAW

Image
Edited By : Asy'kobi Under the Nigerian criminal justice the constitutional right of an accused person is enshrined in Section 35 and 36 of the Constitution of  the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 such rights include, the right to be informed promptly in the language that he understands, the details and nature of the offence of the accused, the right to be given adequate time to prepare his defence, the right to defend himself in person or by legal practitioner of his own choice, the right to have an interpreter free of charge if he does not understand the language of the court, the right to have record of the proceeding kept and the right to have copies of this within seven days of the conclusion of the case, the right to remain silent during the trial, the right not to be tried and convicted twice for the same offence, the right to be presumed innocent until he is proved guilty and the right not to be charged for an unwritten offence. All these rights are aimed at ensurin...
Read more

IMMUNITY CLAUSE OF SECTION 308 OF THE NIGERIAN CONSTITUTION

Image
Edited by: Asy"kobi Meaning and limits of section  308 The provisions of section 308 of the Constitution came up for interpretation in the case of  Abacha vs. Fawehinmi,  wherein his lordship, Uwaifo, J.S.C., held thus: The immunity provided for does not apply to the person in question in his official capacity or to a civil or criminal proceeding in which such a person is only a nominal party. The immunity is to protect such a person from the harassment of his person while in office for his action done in his private capacity before or during his tenure in office. In fact in the present case, the suit is against the “Head of State and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces (General Sani Abacha) ” and it is in respect of his alleged action in his official capacity. The immunity provided for in the Constitution does not arise and does not apply. Also, in  Rotimi vs. MacGregor,  the then Military Governor of Western State, 1 st  appellant herein,...
Read more